Blowjob Request Form

Terms of Service

1. Acceptance of Terms
NEE and Tania provide blowjobs (Services) to those who request them, subject to the following Terms of Service ("TOS"). Your use of the Services in whole or in part constitutes your binding acceptance of these TOS. If you do not agree to these TOS, you should not use the Services. Some Services may be subject to additional posted rules, policies and terms. When you use those Services, you and Tania shall be subject to those additional conditions, which are incorporated by reference into these TOS (and, consequently, form part of your agreement with us).

2. Description of Services
The Services consist of Tania performing fellatio on selected individuals who have requested the Services through this form. Travel and other expenses will be covered by NEE. Any sort of recording (video, audio or photographs) of the performance is strictly prohibited without written permission. We adhere to high standards of service but due to time limitations each performance can last no longer than 5 minutes, no exceptions will be made under any circumstance.

3. General Requirements and Rules of Conduct
Services will only be provided to those who meet the following requirements:

* applicants must be 18yrs old or above
* condoms must be used and provided and paid for by the user
* the user shall not engage in any other form of physical contact
* any attempt to influence the depth of insertion by the user will result in immediate end of service
* Tania may deny service for hygiene reasons

NSFW!

The NEE party in Antwerp have put forward a candidate who is posing naked and offering blowjobs for 40,000 voters. I almost wish I was Dutch (the best the Finns have come up with is a Minister for Culture and Sports who is a former model; the UK's best is good old Mrs Thatcher. Typical).

We adhere to high standards of service but due to time limitations each performance can last no longer than 5 minutes, no exceptions will be made under any circumstance.

Antwerp is a city in Belgium, so you should mean 'Belgian' instead of 'Dutch'... Perhaps a small geographical difference, but a big one in culture.

Antwerp is a city in Belgium, so you should mean 'Belgian' instead of 'Dutch'... Perhaps a small geographical difference, but a big one in culture.

Belgium, Holland, it's all the same really. Their culture is only different to the locals - once you get more than 50 miles away nobody can tell ;-)

Ah you are SO right!
What is after all the difference between Scots and English

Ah you are SO right!
What is after all the difference between Scots and English

Historically? Politically? Culturally? Legally? Historico-linguistically? Quite a lot.

In practical terms for modern society, not much.

I think kilts come under 'culture'.

Interesting that this new fellow appears to have signed up, just specially to make that crack about Scots and English.

I think kilts come under 'culture'.

Interesting that this new fellow appears to have signed up, just specially to make that crack about Scots and English.

Nah, I think he really signed up to make a crack about you.

Just got this time annoyed with the ease the differences between Flemish and Dutch are discarded. After all, they went separated ways over 150 years ago.

Just got this time annoyed with the ease the differences between Flemish and Dutch are discarded. After all, they went separated ways over 150 years ago.

<serious>

I'm perfectly well aware of the differences there, as between any groups of people. However, I was making a joke based on the fact that I have no connection to any of these (I've never even been to either country) and hence, the difference, if any, makes no diffference whatsoever to my life.

</serious>

Besides, I'm not entirely sure there is a difference...

... and believe me: there is more difference most of times than even the involved people think there is.

1745 was a Scottish rebellion, so it's the consequences of your own actions :-P Actually, it wasn't entirely a matter of England vs Scotland; some of the Jacobite supporters were English (which is why the Earl of Derwentwater lost his head, having chosen the losing side). You could also possibly argue a lot of it was more the French trying to use it to cause trouble (possibly; my knowledge of the subject is pretty limited to things I vaguely recall but which may be wrong).

There is a fucking difference, even if you don't see it.

Why do you think nervus registered? Like me, he's Dutch so he knows this.

It's rather ironic you can point out a bit of history concerning Scotland and England, but you probably can't do the same for the Dutch and the Flemish, so it's negligible?

It's negligible to you perhaps

For me personally I divide the inhabitants of the UK in Londoners, English, Scots and Welsh. In my UK travels in the past 20 years that seemed to be a reasonable division for interacting with the locals.

Hey, I've only tried to correct you there. There is a fucking difference, even if you don't see it.

Why do you think nervus registered? Like me, he's Dutch so he knows this. It's rather ironic you can point out a bit of history concerning Scotland and England, but you probably can't do the same for the Dutch and the Flemish, so it's negligible? It's negligible to you perhaps, but in all fairness, it is more than relevant. Yes, even in "practical terms for modern society".

Holland as a country does no longer exist, since a few hundred years I think. It's the Netherlands now. Please give us that bit of respect, as I do know the difference between the UK and England and respect the difference and certainly wouldn't like a foreign newspaper referring to the Dutch and Flemish as the same.

Just a short note about the relation between the Dutch and the Belgians is to be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Republic
For me personally I divide the inhabitants of the UK in Londoners, English, Scots and Welsh. In my UK travels in the past 20 years that seemed to be a reasonable division for interacting with the locals.

... and believe me: there is more difference most of times than even the involved people think there is.

That can again refer to any give example. Back to the Scots and the English: a question I often get asked is, "But seriously, there's no difference, is there?"

Well. We have different legal systems (Scottish vs English law, court systems), seperate police forces, a seperate educational and university system (all levels), a distinct cultural and historical background (coming from the Celts and Vikings, while the English background is largely from the Romans and French and Saxons), a different linguistic background (again, Gaelic and the Celtic/Viking languages, as opposed to French and Latin), our own religions (although the church is so splintered in general that it's hardly unique), our own saints, flags, and designs of coins and notes (we still have the £1 note, for example, and when I was in York a shopkeeper didn't believe it was real - also, many English from the South don't accept Scottish £10 and £20 notes), the list just goes on.

In fact, I'd be speaking Gaelic right now rather than English if it weren't for the fact that we lost a battle (yes, I'm referring to 1745) and the English banned the national language, Gaelic, as well as breaking up the clan system, locking up all the clan leaders, banning the wearing of tartan, and so forth. I'm not trying to be bitter here, I'm just pointing out that in most foreign countries England = UK and UK = England, but that is just not true. Only England = England, and thank god it stops there...

Scottish nationlists love to play up the differences when in fact eveybody who lives in Scotland originated either in England or came from overseas.

They ignore the massive population interchange occurring over centuries, they ignore the common history post union of Crowns

they ignore the incredible success of Scotland and Scottish during the Empire

The SNP remind me of some extremist religious or fascist party who exploit democracy to get into power and then aim to destroy it.

In fact, we are all BRITISH.

So what is Holland? Everybody uses it interchangeably here with the Netherlands? 

FWIW, my perception is that the Flemish part of Belgium is polite and Anglophilic whereas the French speaking part is Anglophobic.

When I was in Belgium I was told that to say Flemish and Dutch were the same was inviting trouble

Me: Can you guess what country I'm from by my accent?
...
Them: Okay, I give up. Where then?
Me: I'm British!

Since when has Britain been a country? Stupid Scots not knowing the difference between a country and a group of islands/kingdom/empire (etc, etc)

BTW: I am really sorry that my remarks ignited some kind of flame-war

Britain is the short or common name for the country officially known as "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".

But I am still British.