|
RISC OS Select finally available. |
|
This is a long thread. Click here to view the threaded list. |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89225, posted at 09:42, 17/10/2001 |
Unregistered user
|
Well done Richard - up before any other portals have it :-)
This is good news, although I wonder when it'll be avaliable for Microdigital/Riscstation machines (or if it works, when it'll be tested). When I talked to Microdigital a couple of months ago, they hadn't heard anything from ROL... |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #89226, posted at 09:47, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89225 |
Unregistered user
|
Sorry, I can't claim that one, Cybervillage has it ;) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Peter Darnell |
Message #89227, posted at 12:08, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89226 |
Unregistered user
|
In fact it was on risc os .net yesterday
http://riscos.net/riscos/newsfeature.asp?story=24
I know as I put it there.
But it is a bit of a obscure place i suppose.
Peter. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89228, posted at 13:15, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89227 |
Unregistered user
|
OK, OK - that'll teach me to check Drobe and riscos.org, and then say The Iconbar was first... especially when I do actually go to the Cybervillage and riscos.net.
Maybe I like The Iconbar so much I'm looking for any reason to praise them :-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Duffell |
Message #89229, posted at 15:22, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89228 |
Unregistered user
|
Surely ROL don't have to talk to MD before they write a version for Micos? If I want to write some software I don't contact the company which mankes the computer first. Mind you, an OS upgerade might be a little more tricky, but I assume ROL have all the necessary info.
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89230, posted at 15:28, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89229 |
Unregistered user
|
Perhaps, but it seemed odd that they hadn't heard *anything* from ROL about it. I don't know much about the different RISC OS builds - it is likely to work without modification, or is there zero chance? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Lee Johnston |
Message #89231, posted at 16:32, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89230 |
Unregistered user
|
ROL shouldn't be writing versions for Micos, RiscStations etc by themselves. At the very least they should be communicating with both companies either to get a machine to test on or to have the companies test, report back, modify the OS etc
As a RiscStation owner I glad I didn't subscribe to Select, and I won't until RISC OS Ltd can prove it'll run on my machine.
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89232, posted at 17:59, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89231 |
Unregistered user
|
Maybe all will become clear at RISC OS 2001. At least you've got all the developers in one room for once ;-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew P Harmsworth |
Message #89233, posted at 19:29, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89232 |
Unregistered user
|
Horay! The waiting is over. And in time for RISC OS 2001 - great news. RISCOS Ltd should be congratulated. I'm off home to download it, and see what it does to my machine... :-)
And for the record, riscos.org got the news story before anyone else! It's just that I couldn't upload the article via Opera nor IE5... :-p |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89234, posted at 20:13, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89233 |
Unregistered user
|
Yeah, yeah, you guys are *all* wonderful :-)
And don't get me wrong - I think it's fantasic news too. And I'm sure that if versions need to be produced for other machines it can be done quickly. I just can't wait for RISC OS 2001! |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Daniel Barron |
Message #89235, posted at 22:37, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89234 |
Unregistered user
|
Has no one noticed that the RO4 Select logo is a unoriginal and blatent copy of the KDE logo? See www.kde.org for yourself. I wonder how they get away with this? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Mr. Crowley |
Message #89236, posted at 22:52, 17/10/2001, in reply to message #89235 |
Unregistered user
|
Not bothered. Me likes Select. Will make life easier. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Chris Williams |
Message #89237, posted at 02:04, 18/10/2001, in reply to message #89236 |
Unregistered user
|
Bah drat and double drat. If I weren't snowed under with work and setting fire alarms off, I could have fired off an article too..
RISC OS 4+ looks so nice. The race is on to find easter eggs :)
Chris @ drobe.co.uk |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Small Middlebrain |
Message #89238, posted at 23:23, 18/10/2001, in reply to message #89237 |
Unregistered user
|
Well as for testing Select on other machines I can see the point, after all its not as though RISC OS Ltd have a Mico, RiscStation and Kinetic so they can test software?.....oh....they do....oh..... so Select doesn't work because they can't be arsed to get the machines out of the cupboard? Mind you perhaps they had to sell them to pay the rent?
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89239, posted at 10:09, 19/10/2001, in reply to message #89238 |
Unregistered user
|
Or maybe everyone was getting so impatient about Select, that they thought they would release it as soon as it is ready for vanilla RPC's, rather than wait an extra couple of weeks (missing RISC OS 2001) to get is running on Riscstation, etc. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Mr Jake Monkeyson |
Message #89240, posted at 10:30, 19/10/2001, in reply to message #89239 |
Unregistered user
|
Will RiscStation and Mico owners have to wait until the *next* CD before they can use Select? That's hardly fair if their subscription runs for the same amount of time. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89241, posted at 13:03, 19/10/2001, in reply to message #89240 |
Unregistered user
|
Actually, I forgot about that. ROL have advertised that there is not currently support for Microdigital/Riscstation (can't remember about Kinetic) so seeing as I'm getting an Omega I haven't subscribed yet ;-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Random Passer By |
Message #89242, posted at 15:35, 19/10/2001, in reply to message #89241 |
Unregistered user
|
It all sounds incredibly crap... |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
flounder |
Message #89243, posted at 13:53, 20/10/2001, in reply to message #89242 |
Unregistered user
|
I've noticed the similarity to the Shell Select logo :-)
Little yellow pointy sun.
Maybe ROL will start selling tins of beans and newspapers and stuff
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
PFJ |
Message #89244, posted at 17:20, 20/10/2001, in reply to message #89243 |
Unregistered user
|
Oh yes, did I mention that I don't like RISC OS Select? Oh yes, did I mention that I don't like RISC OS Select? Oh yes, did I mention that I don't like RISC OS Select? Oh yes, did I mention that I don't like RISC OS Select? ... |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
cleminan |
Message #89245, posted at 21:34, 20/10/2001, in reply to message #89244 |
Unregistered user
|
come again? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Graham |
Message #89246, posted at 06:32, 21/10/2001, in reply to message #89245 |
Unregistered user
|
No, don't bother. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Lee Johnston |
Message #89247, posted at 09:34, 21/10/2001, in reply to message #89246 |
Unregistered user
|
From the RISC OS 2001 show yesterday
Lee: "So what's the story with with Select and RiscStations?"
Paul Middleton: "Forget it".
I then got another two sentences shifting the blame to Simtec and that was it - I get the impression that Paul may have got grilled in his theatre presentation and I happened to ask the question just after.
Simtec / RiscStation weren't there so I couldn't field the question to them.
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Guy Inchbald |
Message #89248, posted at 10:46, 21/10/2001, in reply to message #89247 |
Unregistered user
|
hey, if it was all open source, then RiscStation and MicroDigital could fix it themselves to run on their boxes. oh, somebody shut him up and let Pace throw away their IP's future in peace. Pace are co-founders of the embedded Linux steering group, and won't listen to the likes of us blther rant. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89249, posted at 12:53, 21/10/2001, in reply to message #89248 |
Unregistered user
|
I usually get fed up with people slagging off the RISC OS market, but if (and I do say if) that above comment about Riscstations and Select is true, we might as well all give up. That is just *pathetic*. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Captain Moriarty |
Message #89250, posted at 20:49, 21/10/2001, in reply to message #89249 |
Unregistered user
|
Well, it actually makes a change PM blaming Simtec/RiscStation. I thought they normally targetted the problems on users, people who say things which indicate that ROS Ltd have lost the plot or basically, people that they don't like. At least now they have *said* it is such a company publically (though no doubt, it was "misquoted" or "out of context" as the two AU articles were) and given that, the company themselves can now take legal action against ROS Ltd for such an unwarrented attack on their good and well respected name.
Ho hum, what comes around, goes around :-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89251, posted at 01:52, 22/10/2001, in reply to message #89250 |
Unregistered user
|
There's far too much nastiness going round. Individual companies/people - great! But relationships between certain companies/individuals... :-/
If everyone hangs together, and does something, we have a future. If we split off into factions, and argue, there's no future.
I'm at uni at the moment - I hope by the time I've finished, there's some kind of job for me in the RISC OS market. If not, then the UNIX/Linux communities will have to put up with my appalling programming ;-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Lee Johnston |
Message #89252, posted at 09:34, 22/10/2001, in reply to message #89251 |
Unregistered user
|
The comment is true and the question was one of the reasons I went to the show - I was actually ready to sign up for Select but even if ROS Ltd and Simtec sort out their differences I doubt I'm going to have the confidence in the "establishment" to put my money where my mouth is.
Mind you I suspect I'll be greeted with some level of sceptism and even be flamed on the newsgroups because I feel there are people who don't want to believe that this is happening.
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #89253, posted at 17:52, 22/10/2001, in reply to message #89252 |
Unregistered user
|
Any idea as to why? Is this anything to do with the whole avaliability of masked ROMs debate between ROL and SIMTEC? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Lee Johnston |
Message #89254, posted at 09:39, 23/10/2001, in reply to message #89253 |
Unregistered user
|
As to why I can only speculate and no I don't believe it has anything to do with the ROM debate.
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Pages (2): 1
> >|
|