log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- Gerph's live coding session on Youtube (News:1)
- Rougol June 2024 meeting on monday (News:1)
- WROCC June 2024 meeting - Mark Moxon dissects Lander (News:1)
- WROCC June 2024 meeting on wednesday - Mark Moxon on Lander (News:1)
- June developer 'fireside' chat is on saturday night (News:)
- May 2024 News Summary (News:5)
- Archive Edition 27:2 reviewed (News:)
- RISC OS 5.30 arrives (News:12)
- Rougol Talk May 2024 - Andy Vawer (News:)
- Rougol May 2024 meeting on monday with Andy Vawer (News:1)
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: Site Comments: Bad layout
 
  Bad layout
  filecore (10:15 29/11/2006)
  Phlamethrower (10:29 29/11/2006)
    moss (10:31 29/11/2006)
      rich (12:20 29/11/2006)
        filecore (18:51 29/11/2006)
 
Jason Togneri Message #94679, posted by filecore at 10:15, 29/11/2006

Posts: 3867
Despite TIB's distancing itself from RISC OS, it still is one of the primary (and only) sources of RISC OS-related information and help around. Marging Comms into the General forum was a major mistake. Networking issues are one of the most important things for any RO users nowadays, since apart from nostalgia and old games that's the main area of focus. Some of the other forums don't matter so much (Graphics, DTP) but I think it's important to keep networking issues seperate. :cry:
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #94685, posted by Phlamethrower at 10:29, 29/11/2006, in reply to message #94679
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
It was :monkey:'s idea :P

Anyway, we can restore the old forum sections & thread locations from a backup if there are enough complaints about the new grouping.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #94687, posted by moss at 10:31, 29/11/2006, in reply to message #94685

Posts: 9348
I take the basic point. Although the forum sections were meant to reflect what the new site is going to post articles about - and extend according to what the site ends up covering. (I'm still hoping for a Mac forum section, myself...)

Maybe we need more networking articles :P
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #94693, posted by rich at 12:20, 29/11/2006, in reply to message #94687
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
We got basically no traffic in the comms forum. It makes no sense to have a whole forum sitting idle.
It also makes things harder to find, because people have to go through multiple half-empty forums to find what they're looking for.

And since when is forum structure anything to do with "Bad layout"?
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jason Togneri Message #94749, posted by filecore at 18:51, 29/11/2006, in reply to message #94693

Posts: 3867
And since when is forum structure anything to do with "Bad layout"?
Yeah I wanted to change that as soon as I posted but there's no way to edit the thread title :(
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 

The Icon Bar: Site Comments: Bad layout