Peter Naulls has released the fifth
Firefox beta. The new version feels more like a conventional RISC OS application thanks to the icon bar icon and pop up menus. The browser also responds to URI requests from other applications.
Peter warns "this is a "Work in progress" release. It may not be suitable for general use, and there are known bugs in the "RISCOSification" that is in development in this version. This version is instead intended to demonstrated on-going development, and help find problems. Please don't report bugs in this version unless asked to."
Links
RISC OS firefox
Peter's blog
|
Firefox port updated |
|
monkeyson2 (00:37 12/10/2005) sa110_mk (09:59 12/10/2005) rich (10:12 12/10/2005) andrew (19:21 12/10/2005) pnaulls (02:56 16/10/2005) andrew (22:23 16/10/2005) datawave (05:48 17/10/2005)
|
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #93917, posted by monkeyson2 at 00:37, 12/10/2005 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
<pedant>Shouldn't that be "RISC OSification"?</pedant> ;) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Paul Stewart |
Message #93918, posted by sa110_mk at 09:59, 12/10/2005, in reply to message #93917 |
Member
Posts: 144
|
Beta 5 seems much quicker and is very usable on the A9home. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #93919, posted by rich at 10:12, 12/10/2005, in reply to message #93918 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
It's the first version that's stayed loaded long enough (without bombing out) to actually load a page on my machine! I can actually see it working now! It's a little curious as to why certain things are slow - for instance typing a URL into the URL bar when there's a blank page below is treacle-like - but displaying pages is OK compared to other RISC OS browsers. It also takes a while to load - but then it does on my much more powerful Windows machines, so I don't think that's a problem with the port. I particularly like the way that the Windows menus at the top of the browser window are gone - replaced by a proper RISC OS menu system. In general (bearing in mind it's only a test version) I'm liking it. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew |
Message #93920, posted by andrew at 19:21, 12/10/2005, in reply to message #93919 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
Looking much better. The last version seemed quite a lot slower as well. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Peter Naulls |
Message #93921, posted by pnaulls at 02:56, 16/10/2005, in reply to message #93920 |
Member
Posts: 317
|
I was fortunate enough to be able to show the RISC OS version to Ben Goodger last week. This isn't an attempt to show off who I've met, but rather demonstrate at least a little wider recognition of the platform given a well-known piece of software existing on it. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew |
Message #93922, posted by andrew at 22:23, 16/10/2005, in reply to message #93921 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
It can't get enough exposure IMHO. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Datawave Nederland |
Message #93923, posted by datawave at 05:48, 17/10/2005, in reply to message #93922 |
Member
Posts: 9
|
FF beta5 is quite a lot faster than the beta4 of FF. There it still is a WIP version, I got it vanished from my iconbar within 2 minutes, because FF b5 collapsed. I really hope PN is making the rendering of pages better, also when trying to put your own url in it, that the main pulldown window under the URL locator is overlapping the URL locator window, at least on my machine (RISC OS 4.02). |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
|